Ankle range of motion norms
2026-10-18 · 10 min read
Twenty degrees of dorsiflexion is the number every chart prints; the CDC’s healthy adults averaged under fourteen. Here is the textbook pair, what large samples actually measured, and the knee and weight-bearing details that decide which number applies.
20° · 50°
Textbook dorsiflexion · plantarflexion (AAOS, via Norkin & White)
12.7–13.8°
Measured mean dorsiflexion, healthy adults 20–44 (CDC, men–women)
≈65°
Big-toe extension used in ordinary walking (Hopson 1995)
The reference numbers
| Motion | Textbook | Healthy adults 19–32, passive / active | Position · axis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dorsiflexion | 20° | 22° / 19° | Supine · lateral malleolus |
| Plantarflexion | 50° | 50° / 45° | Supine · lateral malleolus |
| Inversion | — | 34° / 30° | Sitting · base of calcaneus |
| Eversion | — | 20° / 17° | Sitting · base of calcaneus |
Middle column: right-side means from 987 healthy adults measured with the AAOS technique (Hallaçeli 2014), rounded to whole degrees. The textbook column is the sagittal pair on our ROM chart; it carries no inversion or eversion figure, so use the measured column for those.
Two things stand out. Passive readings run a few degrees above active ones at every motion — so a note that says “DF 19°” without saying which is unreadable at re-test. And inversion is the big frontal-plane motion: in that sample it was well over one and a half times eversion, which matters when you judge an “equal” loss in both directions.
Reference ranges, not pass marks
Reference values below are the AAOS figures as reproduced in Norkin & White, Measurement of Joint Motion: A Guide to Goniometry. Published sources differ by roughly 5–10° at several joints; the AMA Guides use a partly different set. Treat them as reference ranges, not pass/fail cut-offs.
By age and sex: the CDC numbers
The CDC’s normal-ROM study had physical therapists measure passive motion in 674 healthy people aged 2 to 69. Its dorsiflexion means sit well below the textbook in every adult group; its plantarflexion means sit at or above it.
| Age | DF women | DF men | PF women | PF men |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2–8 | 24.8 (22.5–27.1) | 22.8 (21.3–24.3) | 67.1 (64.8–69.4) | 55.8 (54.4–57.2) |
| 9–19 | 17.3 (15.6–19) | 16.3 (14.9–17.7) | 57.3 (54.8–59.8) | 52.8 (50.8–54.8) |
| 20–44 | 13.8 (12.9–14.7) | 12.7 (11.6–13.8) | 62.1 (60.6–63.6) | 54.6 (53.2–56) |
| 45–69 | 11.6 (10.6–12.6) | 11.9 (10.9–12.9) | 56.5 (55–58) | 49.4 (47.7–51.1) |
Degrees, mean (95% confidence interval of the mean). Passive goniometry.
- Textbook (AAOS, Norkin & White)20°
- Adults 19–32, passive (Hallaçeli)22°
- Adults 19–32, active (Hallaçeli)19°
- CDC women 20–4413.8°
- CDC men 20–4412.7°
- CDC women 45–6911.6°
- CDC men 45–6911.9°
Dorsiflexion falls steadily with age — women go from 24.8° in early childhood to 11.6° at 45–69. Plantarflexion carries the sex gap: women out-range men in every band, by about 7° in the oldest group. A second large sample of young adults found sex differences under 3° at every lower-limb motion, so the gap is real in one dataset and trivial in another.
Twelve degrees of dorsiflexion is a deficit against the textbook and dead average against the CDC. Which table you quote decides whether the patient has a problem.
Symmetry is steadier ground. The young-adult sample found no clinically meaningful right–left difference at the ankle, and an older Swedish study of 192 ankles in men aged 30–40 found none either and said so plainly: use the healthy limb as the comparison. The same logic runs through the hip norms.
Knee straight or knee bent
Dorsiflexion is two measurements wearing one name. The gastrocnemius crosses the knee; the soleus does not. With the knee straight, a short gastrocnemius stops the ankle early. Bend the knee and the gastrocnemius goes slack, so what is left limiting the range is the soleus, the posterior capsule and the joint itself.
Gains a lot when the knee bends
The gastrocnemius is the brake. Stretch it in standing with the knee locked, and expect the knee-straight number to move first.
Equally limited both ways
Look past the gastrocnemius: soleus, capsule, or a bony block at the front of the ankle. The end-feel tells them apart — a hard stop with anterior pinch is not a tight calf.
Technique moves the number as much as anatomy does. In 40 uninjured high-school athletes measured supine by one experienced examiner, mean dorsiflexion was about 0° knee-straight and about 5° knee-bent — far below every table on this page. A podiatry study that set a normal non-weight-bearing range of 0–16.5° found a weight-bearing range of 7.1–34.7° in the same people, and the two correlated poorly.
Common mistake
Writing “DF 10°” with no knee position. A re-test taken the other way can show a gain or a loss of several degrees that never happened. If the knee will not fully straighten, the knee-straight reading is compromised before you start — check it against the knee norms first.
The weight-bearing lunge test
Because lying-down dorsiflexion predicts standing dorsiflexion so poorly, it is worth pairing with a loaded test. In the lunge test the patient faces a wall and drives the knee forward to touch it with the heel kept down, sliding the foot back until the heel just stays on the floor. Score it as the distance from big toe to wall, or as the angle of the shin with an inclinometer — pick one and keep it.
| Lunge test property | Value |
|---|---|
| Same clinician, re-test (ICC) | 0.65–0.99 |
| Two clinicians (ICC) | 0.80–0.99 |
| Smallest real change, same clinician | 1.9 cm · 4.7° |
| Smallest real change, two clinicians | 1.6 cm · 4.6° |
Pooled from 12 reliability studies (Powden 2015). Smallest real change = minimal detectable change.
Read that bottom pair as the noise floor: a patient who moves from 8 cm to 9 cm has not changed. Two centimetres, measured by the same person, is where a gain starts to be believable.
For a reference, a 899-adult normative study published in 2026 found no meaningful difference between limbs, a steady fall with age that steepens from the 60–69 group, and only a slight edge for men. That makes side-to-side asymmetry the useful number; its age- and sex-specific percentile tables are in the paper, and we have not copied a cut-off from anywhere else.
Inversion, eversion and the subtalar joint
In the 987-adult sample, inversion and eversion were measured sitting, with the axis at the base of the calcaneus: 34° and 20° passive. A small 1986 study using a different method put the whole inversion-plus-eversion arc at 28° — roughly half of that. Frontal-plane numbers swing with method far more than the sagittal pair, so one is only comparable with another taken the same way.
Reliability follows the same pattern. One study had three observers measure active inversion and eversion sitting and prone on two days: the same observer within a session was highly reliable, different observers much less so, and between sessions eversion held up worse than inversion. Position mattered little for one observer; between observers, sitting did better.
Say what you held still
A reading taken at the heel and one taken across the whole forefoot are measuring different things. Write the position and the landmark, keep the same clinician for the re-test, and trust a change in inversion before a change in eversion.
The big toe
First-toe extension is the motion most often left off an ankle exam and the one late stance cannot do without. Filming 20 healthy adults walking put the extension actually used at about 65°. All four static techniques tested were reliable and all read higher than that walking figure — but they did not agree with each other, so they are not interchangeable.
A stiff first toe below what walking uses is worth watching for in the gait: an early heel lift or a roll off the outer border of the foot. If you are retraining that pattern, the gait training (97116) guide covers what makes it billable.
Measuring it so the re-test means something
Position: supine or long sitting for the sagittal pair, sitting for inversion and eversion. Note the knee angle for dorsiflexion.
Axis on the lateral malleolus. Stationary arm along the fibula toward the fibular head; moving arm parallel to the fifth metatarsal.
Zero the reading at neutral — foot at a right angle to the shin — before you move anything.
Take the end of range, passive or active, and write which. Then the end-feel.
Measure the other ankle the same way, in the same visit.
Recording the protractor, not the motion
At neutral the goniometer arms sit at a right angle, so the dial often reads 90°. A note that says “DF 110°” means 20° of dorsiflexion to one clinician and nonsense to the next. Record degrees from neutral: dorsiflexion and plantarflexion are separate numbers (the textbook pair is 20° and 50°), never one arc.
The general goniometer habits — same position, marked landmarks, same clinician — are in the goniometer measurement guide. If you are billing a stand-alone measurement rather than folding it into an evaluation, read the CPT 95851 guide first.
Check a patient against the norms
Enter both ankles. The checker leads with the side-to-side difference, then sets the involved ankle against the CDC mean for the patient’s age and sex, and writes the objective line for you.
Pre-filled with a 52-year-old woman six weeks after an inversion sprain. Change any field.
Dorsiflexion
6°
- Other ankle
- 12°-6°(50%)
- CDC group mean
- 11.6°-5.6°
- 95% CI of that mean
- 10.6–12.6°
Plantarflexion
44°
- Other ankle
- 55°-11°(80%)
- CDC group mean
- 56.5°-12.5°
- 95% CI of that mean
- 55–58°
The confidence interval brackets the group average, not the spread of healthy people — a healthy ankle can sit well outside it. The other side is the comparison that counts.
Objective line
Ankle PROM (goniometer): DF 6° involved / 12° uninvolved, knee extended; PF 44° involved / 55° uninvolved. CDC reference, women 45–69: DF 11.6°, PF 56.5°.
Turning the number into a plan
Pair every ankle range with a task the patient names — stairs, squatting to a low shelf, running downhill — and a functional score such as the LEFS, because degrees that change nothing the patient does are not yet a result. The objective line drops straight into the SOAP note generator, and the re-measure date belongs in the plan of care, not in your memory.
For the home programme, knee-straight and knee-bent calf stretches are two different exercises; prescribe the one your measurement pointed at in the home exercise program builder.
Red flag — refer out
Calf pain with swelling and warmth after immobilisation or surgery, a sudden loss of plantarflexion strength after a pop in the heel cord, or range that keeps falling against treatment is not a measurement problem. Stop measuring and refer.
Empirical values by age and sex: Soucie JM et al. Range of motion measurements: reference values and a database for comparison studies. Haemophilia. 2011;17(3):500-507 — the CDC-funded normal joint ROM study, which measured healthy subjects by age and sex.
Sources
- Norkin CC, White DJ. Measurement of Joint Motion: A Guide to Goniometry — the AAOS reference values as reproduced there; published sources differ by roughly 5–10° at several joints
- CDC — Normal Joint Range of Motion Study: reference values for normal joint ROM by age and sex — 674 healthy subjects aged 2–69, passive goniometry by nine physical therapists; means with 95% CIs (Soucie et al., Haemophilia 2011) · read 2026-10-18
- Soucie JM et al. Range of motion measurements: reference values and a database for comparison studies. Haemophilia. 2011;17(3):500–507 — the CDC-funded normal-ROM study, measured by age and sex · read 2026-10-18
- Hallaçeli H, Uruç V, Uysal HH, et al. Normal hip, knee and ankle range of motion in the Turkish population. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2014;48(1):37–42 — 987 healthy adults aged 19–32, AAOS technique, active and passive; full text, Tables 2–4 · read 2026-10-18
- Roaas A, Andersson GB. Normal range of motion of the hip, knee and ankle joints in male subjects, 30–40 years of age. Acta Orthop Scand. 1982;53(2):205–208 — 192 ankles, AAOS technique; no significant right–left difference, healthy limb suggested as the comparison · read 2026-10-18
- Saxena A, Kim W. Ankle dorsiflexion in adolescent athletes. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2003;93(4):312–314 — 40 uninjured high-school athletes, supine goniometry, knee extended and flexed · read 2026-10-18
- Baggett BD, Young G. Ankle joint dorsiflexion: establishment of a normal range. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1993;83(5):251–254 — non-weight-bearing vs weight-bearing dorsiflexion; poor correlation between the two · read 2026-10-18
- Powden CJ, Hoch JM, Hoch MC. Reliability and minimal detectable change of the weight-bearing lunge test: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2015;20(4):524–532 — 12 studies; inter-clinician ICC 0.80–0.99, intra-clinician ICC 0.65–0.99; MDC 4.6°/1.6 cm and 4.7°/1.9 cm · read 2026-10-18
- McBride S, Isabelle PL, Gómez-Carrión Á, et al. International normative values for the weight-bearing lunge test across age and sex in 899 healthy adults. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2026;82:103525 — distance-based knee-to-wall protocol, seven age groups; abstract · read 2026-10-18
- Sepic SB, Murray MP, Mollinger LA, et al. Strength and range of motion in the ankle in two age groups of men and women. Am J Phys Med. 1986;65(2):75–84 — 40 healthy adults; total inversion/eversion arc averaged 28° · read 2026-10-18
- Menadue C, Raymond J, Kilbreath SL, et al. Reliability of two goniometric methods of measuring active inversion and eversion range of motion at the ankle. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:60 — 30 subjects, three observers, sitting and prone · read 2026-10-18
- Hopson MM, McPoil TG, Cornwall MW. Motion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: reliability and validity of four measurement techniques. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1995;85(4):198–204 — 20 healthy adults; static measures vs video of walking · read 2026-10-18
Keep reading
Resistance band exercises, by tension
Band work by colour and tension, with sets, reps and progression rules.
Neck pain exercises, staged
A staged neck programme, from deep flexor holds to scapular loading.
Goniometer measurement
Axis, stationary arm, moving arm — and how much error to expect.
Chiropractor salary
What chiropractors earn employed versus in their own practice.
Published 2026-10-18 · reviewed 2026-10-18